Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Olivia Dennison (Binghamton University) vs. Opposition: Miki Kawana (Shorin Global)

Judge: Michael Schatz (University of Pennsylvania)

Resolution: THBT: An overriding ethical obligation to protect and preserve extraterrestrial microbial life and ecosystems should be incorporated into international law.

  • Olivia Dennison
    Olivia Dennison
    vs.



    Miki Kawana
    Miki Kawana
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at April 10, 2016 08:28:34PM EST by Olivia Dennison

    Citations

    Show

    "Global Monitoring Report." Global Monitoring Report. Web. 10 Apr. 2016.
    http://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/global-monitoring-report

    "Center for Sustainability & Commerce." How Much Do We Waste Daily? Web. 10 Apr. 2016.
    https://center.sustainability.duke.edu/resources/green-facts-consumers/how-much-do-we-waste-daily

    "UNTC." UNTC. Web. 10 Apr. 2016.
    https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ParticipationStatus.aspx

    Posted at April 12, 2016 08:51:32AM EST by Miki Kawana

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at April 14, 2016 10:37:39AM EST by Joe Leeson-Schatz

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at April 14, 2016 12:09:14PM EST by Miki Kawana

    Citations

    Show

    Opposition closing speech

    Posted at April 15, 2016 11:04:14AM EST by Olivia Dennison

    Citations

    Show

    "Tools & Documentations." PDS: Tools & Documents. Web. 15 Apr. 2016.
    https://pds.jpl.nasa.gov

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at April 17, 2016 01:17:45AM EST by Michael Schatz

    Category Olivia Dennison Miki Kawana
    Use of evidence: 3.9 3.6
    Delivery skill: 3.8 4.1
    Coherence of arguments: 3.4 3.9
    Responsiveness to opponent: 3 3.4
    Identification of key points: 3.6 3.4
    Comments: You did a good job. I think you were very methodical. I felt you did a great job answering all the concerns. Great work.

    The decision is for the Opposition: Miki Kawana

    Reason for Decision:

    I felt that the observation did an overall better job making a coherent argument. I have nothing clear to point to, just an overall feeling. You both did well.


    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT