Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Alondra Mendoza (ITESM) vs. Opposition: nozomi shinagawa (Shorin Global)

Judge: Dan Schatz (Unaffiliated)

Resolution: This house believes that prisons should be abolished

  • Alondra Mendoza
    Alondra Mendoza
    vs.



    nozomi shinagawa
    nozomi shinagawa
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at April 13, 2015 11:44:49PM EST by Alondra Mendoza

    Citations

    Show


    Office of justice prgrams. (2015, december 04). Retrieved from http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=tp&tid=17


    Office of justice programs. (2014, june 17). Retrieved from http://www.nij.gov/topics/corrections/recidivism/pages/welcome.aspx


    Federal Bureau of Prisons. (2015, February 21). Retrieved from http://www.bop.gov/about/statistics/statistics_inmate_age.jsp


    "Open schools and prisons were closed". -Concepcion Arenal

    Posted at April 14, 2015 02:21:16PM EST by nozomi shinagawa

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at April 16, 2015 01:23:05AM EST by Alondra Mendoza

    Citations

    Show

    Unjust and Unhealthy- A Call to Action on Zambian Prison Health. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/zambia0410_brochure_Lores.pdf

    Posted at April 17, 2015 08:30:38AM EST by Joe Leeson-Schatz

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at April 17, 2015 09:37:10PM EST by Alondra Mendoza

    Citations

    Show

    Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.jaapl.org/content/35/4/406

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at April 19, 2015 11:30:21AM EST by Dan Schatz

    Category Alondra Mendoza nozomi shinagawa
    Use of evidence: 3 3.3
    Delivery skill: 4.5 2.5
    Coherence of arguments: 4.2 3.5
    Responsiveness to opponent: 3.9 3
    Identification of key points: 3.6 3
    Comments: You have a great delivery and give your arguments in a story. I would make sure to continue using data and to extend it throughout. It is very difficult to hear you or understand your arguments when you are far away from the computer. The being said from what I could hear I did not see a clear response to the propositions arguments of why the prison should be abolished

    The decision is for the Proposition: Alondra Mendoza

    Reason for Decision:

    In the end I feel the clearest story was the negatives of the prison system. I think the opposition could have done a better job in saying how the alternative (i.e. no prisons) is not viable, or give an alternative (reform) and how that would solve the problems the propositions brings up.


    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT