Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Emmanuel Padron (San Diego Christian College) vs. Opposition: Elizabeth Jean (Binghamton University)

Judge: Sydney Monteith (Silver Lake)

Resolution: RESOLVED: The United Nations should adopt a resolution decrying or demanding an end to the annual dolphin hunt in Taiji, Japan.

  • Emmanuel  Padron
    Emmanuel Padron
    vs.



    Elizabeth Jean
    Elizabeth Jean
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at April 22, 2014 04:39:36AM EST by Joe Leeson-Schatz

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at April 23, 2014 01:21:18AM EST by Elizabeth Jean

    Citations

    Show

    http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/08/090810-cove-movie-dolphins-ngm/

    http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/oct2005/2005-10-07-06.asp

    Posted at April 24, 2014 03:23:36PM EST by Joe Leeson-Schatz

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at April 25, 2014 01:24:03AM EST by Elizabeth Jean

    Citations

    Show

    http://science.time.com/2010/08/23/oceans-defending-dolphin-killing/

    http://www.opsociety.org/issues/mercury-in-seafood

    Posted at April 26, 2014 07:50:55AM EST by Joe Leeson-Schatz

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at April 28, 2014 12:26:24AM EST by Sydney Monteith

    Category Emmanuel Padron Elizabeth Jean
    Use of evidence: 2.3 4
    Delivery skill: 4 3
    Coherence of arguments: 3.9 4
    Responsiveness to opponent: 3.7 4.3
    Identification of key points: 4.4 3.7
    Comments: You had a good delivery but lacked offense. If I were you I would have focused more on responding to what they said. You answer their args but not as much as you should have. You did very well in the round. However, you should run more offensive arguments. When they don't answer many of your args, mention that some more. Also, use some mor contextual evidence.

    The decision is for the Opposition: Elizabeth Jean

    Reason for Decision:

    Both teams did well but I felt more of a stronger understanding as well as more arguments made By the opp team. Both teams need to use some more evidence and pro team needs some offense In the end of the round. Overall, good job to both teams.


    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT