Skip header content and main navigation Binghamton University, State University of New York - Patrick
Banner Brandon Evans Brittney Bleyle Trevor Reddick Phillip George Sonya Robinson Maneo Choudhury Daniel Friedman Joe Leeson-Schatz Anna Pinchuk Masakazu Kurihara Joshua Frumkin

Binghamton Speech & Debate

Proposition: Ian Kim (Binghamton University) vs. Opposition: Jordan Knight (Binghamton University)

Judge: Jason Smith (Binghamton University)

Resolution: RESOLVED: Sugary drinks should not be sold in primary and secondary schools.

  • Ian Kim
    Ian Kim
    vs.



    Jordan  Knight
    Jordan Knight
    Click to begin

    Speech Details

    Click on the other tabs to watch watch that speech.

    Posted at February 19, 2014 09:02:59PM EST by Ian Kim

    Citations

    Show

    Am J Public Health (2006). Consumption of Soft Drinks and Hyperactivity, Mental Distress, and Conduct Problems Among Adolescents in Oslo, Norway. Retrieved February 19, 2014 from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1586153/

    American Heart Association. (n.d.). Understanding Child Obesity. Retrieved February 19, 2014 from: http://www.heart.org/idc/groups/heart-public/@wcm/@fc/documents/downloadable/ucm_304175.pdf

    Bloomberg. (2013). State judge halts Bloomberg ban on large sugary drinks in New York City. Retrieved February 19 from State judge halts Bloomberg ban on large sugary drinks in New York City

    British Medical Journal. (2006). Bmjupdates⁺: Reduced Consumption Of Sugary Drinks Helps The Heaviest Teenagers To Lose Weight. Retrieved February19,2014from:http://www.jstor.org.proxy.binghamton.edu/stable/10.2307/25456697?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=sugary&searchText=drinks&searchText=children&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3Dsugary%2520drinks%2520children

    Cawley J, Meyerhoefer C. The medical care costs of obesity: an instrumental variables approach. J Health Econ. 2012;31:219-30.

    CBS BOSTON. (2011). Study: Boston Public Schools Sugary Drink Ban Is Working. Retrieved February 19, 2014 from: http://boston.cbslocal.com/2011/08/09/study-boston-public-schools-sugary-drink-ban-is-working/


    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). Huffingtonpost. Retrieved February 19, 2014 from: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-sack-md/kids-sugar_b_3862244.html

    Committee on Accelerating Progress in Obesity Prevention Food and Nutrition Board. (2012). Accelerating Progress in Obesity Prevention: SOLVING THE WEIGHT OF THENATION Retrieved from http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=13275&page=R1
    The American Academy of Pediatrics. (2004). Getting Hard on Soft Drinks in Schools Retrieved from http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=25995

    Posted at February 20, 2014 04:45:05PM EST by Jordan Knight

    Citations

    Show

    Sources
    1. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-11-07/banning-sugary-soda-from-schools-fails-to-cut-teen-consumption.html
    2. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/20129/1/sp04yo02.pdf
    3. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749379707004321
    4. http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1215&context=dlj
    5. http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/physicalactivity/facts.htm
    6. http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/future_of_children/v016/16.landerson.html
    (Childhood Obesity: Trends and Potential Causes) Written By: Patricia M. Anderson (Professor of Economics at Dartmouth College) & Kristin F. Butcher (Senior Economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago)

    Posted at February 21, 2014 11:35:23PM EST by Ian Kim

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at February 22, 2014 06:38:29PM EST by Jordan Knight

    Citations

    Show

    None available for this speech.

    Posted at February 23, 2014 10:30:19PM EST by Ian Kim

    Citations

    Show


    Bloomberg. (2011). Banning Sugary Soda From School Fails to Cut Teen Consumption, Study Finds. Retrieved from: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-11-07/banning-sugary-soda-from-schools-fails-to-cut-teen-consumption.html

    Status

    This match has been completed. Show the Decision.

    Submitted at February 26, 2014 08:57:38AM EST by Jason Smith

    Category Ian Kim Jordan Knight
    Use of evidence: 3 3.7
    Delivery skill: 4.2 4.2
    Coherence of arguments: 3.4 4
    Responsiveness to opponent: 3 4.7
    Identification of key points: 3 4.3
    Comments: You must defend your Norway article, seeing as this is important to your case. You should offer some sort of alternative to banning sugary drinks more clearly if you are not going to contest the evils of sugary drinks.

    The decision is for the Opposition: Jordan Knight

    Reason for Decision:

    The proposition fails to respond to the articulation made about these contracts being necessary in order for schools to profit and educate about the harms of sugary drinks. There is no evidence on the proposition's side that is extended to show that the government will profit more than the contracts help schools. This is a reason to vote for the opposition.


    Add Comment

    Please Create an Account or Log-In to post comments.

    Connect with Binghamton:
    Twitter icon links to Binghamton University's Twitter page YouTube icon links to Binghamton University's YouTube page Facebook icon links to Binghamton University's Facebook page Pinterest icon links to Binghamton University's Pinterest page

    Binghamton University Online Debate Platform powered by:

    PHP MySQL SUIT